The answer is free. The evidence is the product.
Reading the registry and verifying an authority envelope cost nothing and always will, because a trust layer nobody queries is worth nothing. Money is charged for one thing only: producing a verifiable authority and evidence record for a workflow that already moves money or touches regulated data.
Verify
$0
Read any score, receipt, revocation or envelope. No key, no account, no contract. Rate limited to 60 requests a minute per address.
GET /api/reputation/<agent_id>POST /api/verifyGET /api/revocations
Register a seller
$0 while in beta
Register an ed25519 key, publish a capability and a price, and have your receipts count toward a reproducible score. Free until fifty registered sellers, then $49 a month.
- Receipts verified against your key
- Capability listed in the discovery feed
- Embeddable trust badge
Agent Authority Audit
$2,500 fixed fee
Ten business days. One agent workflow. You get signed authority envelopes for every delegation, a verification endpoint your systems call before an action commits, and an evidence file a reviewer can reconstruct without help.
- Scope, budget cap, expiry and revocation per agent
- An answer to "who authorized this, under what policy"
- Works with your existing rail, no custody of funds
Integration pilot
$4,000 for 30 daysThe audit is a one-off. The pilot is the layer running in your path: FIDREON evaluates every proposed action against the agent's mandate before it commits, returns a signed decision, and keeps the record. Thirty days, one workflow, a real budget.
| What | Audit | Pilot |
|---|---|---|
| Duration | 10 business days | 30 days |
| Price | $2,500 fixed | $4,000, then $500 a month |
| Authority envelopes issued | Yes | Yes |
| Decision checked before the action commits | Designed, not enforced | Enforced |
| Revocation propagation | Documented | Live |
| Evidence record per action | Sample set | Every action |
| Your rail changes | None | One call added |
How it starts
When this is not for you
Say it plainly, because most enquiries should end here. If your agents do not move money, do not touch regulated data, and nobody has ever asked you to prove which policy authorized an action, you do not need this yet. If you already run a control that answers "who authorized this agent to spend this amount, under which policy, and where is the record" without hand reconstruction, you do not need this either, and I would rather tell you than sell you an audit.
FIDREON holds no funds, takes no position in any transaction, and publishes no rates or financial products. It authorizes and records; your existing rail settles.
Talk to a person
Email [email protected] with the workflow and the rail. Replies come from a human, usually the same day, and never from a form.